What it is about

A collection on interesting, useful, practical, transformational, general or otherwise valuable ideas from a range of fields — physics, psychology, maths, statistics, business, economy, computer science etc. Each idea is ‘presented’ by a different author, typically with impeccable credentials in the relevant field. Can be read cover-to-cover or one can jump around from one idea to another. One of the books that I come back to every now and to refresh my thinking and understanding and to remind myself of the ideas that I once knew but might have forgotten about since.

This idea is brilliant by John Brockman


Categories

ideas | physics | nature | compendium


Related titles

  • This Idea Must Die: Scientific Theories That Are Blocking Progress by John Brockman

  • This Explains Everything: Deep, Beautiful, and Elegant Theories of How the World Works by by John Brockman

  • This Will Make You Smarter by John Brockman


Key ideas & Notes

  • Relative deprivation

    • People feel disadvantaged when they lack resources or opportunities of another person or social group.

    • When everyone gets richer, no one feels better off because everyone is richer.

    • People want to feel richer than everybody else

    • Assigning high value to a relative status is irrational, but has evolutionary origins as high status in a community used to determine if one can eat and how much one can procreate

  • The illusion of explanatory depth

    • Most people feel they understand the world with far greater detail, coherence and depth than they actually do

    • Understanding IOED helps to fight political extremism

    • Ref: Dunning-Kruger Effect

  • Fundamental attribution error

    • Failure to sufficiently account for the environment a human is in when evaluating his/her behaviour

    • Overestimating the role of traits and underestimating the importance of situations

  • Russell Conjugation

    • Bertrand Russell

    • The human mind is constantly looking ahead, well beyond what's true or false and asks: What are the social consequences of accepting the facts as they are?

    • Most words defined by 1. factual content and 2. emotional content

    • As readers/listeners, our minds generally mirror the emotional state of the sources we read/listen to

    • E.g. illegal aliens vs. undocumented immigrants

    • As narrators, we use different language to instruct listeners on how we expect them to colour their perceptions

    • Words can be considered synonyms if they have the same factual content regardless of their emotional content

  • Intertemporal choice

    • A type of decision where the consequences of choices change over time

    • Includes element of irrationality as humans tend to excessively discount the value of future rewards

    • Solving intertemporal choice requires being future oriented and delay gratification

    • Ref: Tragedy of the Commons

  • The second law of thermodynamics

    • In an isolated system, entropy never decreases

    • Closed systems inexorably become less structured, less organised, less able to accomplish interesting and useful outcomes and slide into grey, tepid, homogeneous monotony and stay there

    • Order can be characterised in terms of all microscopically possible states — Only tiny fraction of these states are useful to us

    • Defines the ultimate purpose of life, mind and human striving: to deploy energy and information to fight back the tide of entropy

  • Exaptation

    • One important phase of evolution

    • Initial stage in which old organs are put to new use for which they are typically only barely functional

    • Subsequent normal natural selection of small variants then gradually shape and perfect exaptations to their new function and which point they become adaptations again

    • First, Adaptation for some function, then Exaptation for a new function and finally further adaptive tuning to this new function

  • Construal

    • Our attitudes, opinions and choices pertain to things NOT as they are in the real world, but as they are represented in our minds.

    • This representation is not complete and neutral but a selective and constrained rendering - a construal

    • As a result, we often see violations of rationality. These are often caused by inconsistent judgements and preferences based on construals in our minds.

  • Motivated reasoning

    • When we are exposed to information to meshes well with what we already believe, we are quick to accept it as factual

    • When we re exposed to information that contradicts our beliefs, we tent do scrutinise it more, ask more questions, pay more attention

    • "Can I believe this" vs. "Must I believe this"

  • Adaptive preference

    • Happens when we bend aspiration towards an expectation in light of experience

    • We come to want what we think is within our grasp.

    • We tend to downgrade the value of previously desired outcomes as their realisation becomes less likely and upgrade the value of previously undesired outcomes as their realisation becomes more likely

  • Substrate independence

    • Alan Turing: Computations are substrate independent

    • Consciousness is the way information "feels" when being processed in certain complex ways.

    • Consciousness is substrate independent

    • It's only the structure of the information processing that matters not the structure of the matter doing the processing!

    • If the information processing itself obeys certain principles, it can give rise to the higher-level substrate independent phenomenon we call consciousness

    • Asks us to reject "carbon chauvinism"

    • It's not the particles that matter, it's the patterns that matter

  • Fallibilism

    • We can never be 100% certain that we are right and must therefore always be open to the possibility we are wrong

    • At the heart of scientific enterprise

    • A guiding principle of free, open, liberal secular societies

    • Gives us license to tear everything up and start again if we need to

  • Type I and Type II errors

    • Type I: False positives

    • Type II: False negatives

    • In some contexts, we aim to avoid accepting Type I errors even if it means committing Type II error and failing to accept results that are true. E.g. criminal trials, scientific efforts

    • In other contexts, Type II errors are more dangerous e.g. competition in business

    • We need to consider not only the outcome we want, but also the type of errors we want to avoid!


Summary

A wonderfully readable book with a huge variety of concepts, ideas and principles from wide range of fields. Illuminating, horizon-broadening and thought-provoking without a need for a deep level of expertise on reader’s side. Curious minds will find this a compelling read.


Mindmap